Boundary Disputes in Chepstow, Bristol & Newport

Boundary disputes about your property and your neighbour’s property can be a source of significant and long-lasting problems. The exact line of the boundary might not be clear in the deeds or you might have believed for many years that a particular piece or strip of land is yours. But you have a neighbour who may genuinely believe that the land is theirs. Boundary disputes often arise in commercial and agricultural settings, but increasingly also with residential property.

Feakes and Co. experienced solicitors can help with boundary disputes in Chepstow, the Forest of Dean, Newport and Bristol. We ready to help and you can call us for a free initial discussion on 01291 639280.

Tensions between neighbours can also arise where damage to a property is caused. Has your neighbour allowed fire, smoke, a crumbling wall or even invasive weeds to cross the boundary causing damage to your property? If so, you may be able to claim compensation from them.

How To Resolve Boundary Disputes

New buildings and extensions, garden walls, hedges, fences and other structures will often be placed on the boundaries between properties. These are usually in the right place, where they should be. But if not, an aggrieved neighbour can demand that they are demolished or moved.

Disputes over boundaries often also involve disputes between neighbouring landowners about rights of way and easements. Where a boundary has been in place for some years, a claim for adverse possession may be involved. Because boundary disputes relate to people’s homes or land, they easily and quickly assume an emotional importance out of proportion to the size or value of the land involved. Disputes can last a long time, be complex and physically as well as financially draining for all involved.

For those reasons, the best approach to a disputed boundary line is to aim for a quick solution agreed by both sides. Often a land surveyor is used to determine the true boundary. Both side agree in advance to be bound by the surveyor’s findings and to share the cost. This should lead to a reasonably satisfactory outcome for all.

If no agreement is possible, then the court can be asked to determine the boundary. However this must be a last resort. The very expensive legal cases over tiny bits of land that occasionally hit the headlines are a warning about the true cost of such claims.

Boundary Disputes And The Value of Your Property

When you are trying to sell your property, if you are in dispute with your neighbour about a boundary it will almost certainly reduce its value. This is the case whether it is a house/flat or an area of land. You will have to declare the dispute to the purchaser and they may demand a significant discount to reflect the fact that they are buying into a dispute.

Far better is to try to resolve the problems with the neighbour before you try to sell. That way when disclosing the (former) boundary dispute to the buyer, you can also disclose the new deed showing the boundary, or settlement document.

Where A Professional Has Made A Mistake

What happens if you buy a property but the boundary was not marked in the right place by a solicitor or other professional? Or you buy a property on the basis of a surveyor’s report, and it turns out that the boundaries were not measured correctly?

In those circumstances, you are likely to be able to bring a professional negligence claim against them. If they have made a mistake which has caused you a loss, then they would probably be found to be negligent. All professionals have insurance for claims against them. So if you bring a claim the insurance company would provide the funds to compensate you.

Party Wall Act

The Party Wall Act 1996 is intended to help prevent and resolve disputes over party walls, boundary walls and excavations near neighbouring buildings. A party wall is a common wall between properties. If your neighbour is proposing to carry out works to or near the wall, they must give you notice. If you do not wish to accept what your neighbour proposes to do, the Act provides a mechanism for resolving the dispute.

It is important to take advice about a particular set of circumstances. Call us today to discuss your situation and how we can help you resolve a boundary dispute.

Make A Free Enquiry

All initial enquiries are completely free of charge. If you are looking for a solicitor nearest you, please call us now on  01291 639280, email info@feakes-legal.com, or complete our Free Online Enquiry for a free no-obligation discussion and let us explain your legal rights and options.

***

Party Wall Act Case Study

We recently helped a client regarding a Party Wall Act dispute. It arose out of building works being planned by her next door neighbour. The client lived at No. 8, which was semi-detached with the neighbours’ house at No. 10. The two properties shared a party wall, which was constructed of 9-inch-thick brick without a cavity. The original kitchens for both houses were on their respective sides of the wall. The kitchens shared a sloping roof which crossed over the party wall.

The neighbours at No. 10 wanted to build an extension to their kitchen. Their plan was to remove the sloping roof on their side of the party wall, and build a new flat roof for their original kitchen and the new extension.
Our client had a problem with this. If No. 10 removed their part of the sloping roof, it meant that the party wall would be exposed to the elements. Because it was a party wall, it would mean a cold spot and condensation problems in her kitchen.

The neighbours appointed a surveyor to consider their plans for the works to No. 10. Under the terms of the Party Wall Act, they needed to appoint a surveyor to represent our client as well, which they did. Unfortunately both No. 10’s surveyor and the surveyor appointed for our client overlooked the client’s objection to the works, and signed off the plans. They agreed a Party Wall award, allowing the works to proceed.

It was at this point that the client first contacted us. She asked us to appeal against the award. We needed to act quickly, because under the Act, an appeal must be filed at court within 14 days.

We prepared the appeal papers, and filed it at court within the deadline. Some months later – during which time we were trying to negotiate a change to No. 10’s plans to accommodate the client’s concerns – the appeal came to court.

The judge found in favour of the client – her appeal was justified. Her objection to neighbours’ plan was upheld. The judge ordered the neighbours to review their plans and amend them to avoid the problems the client had identified.

It was a good result for the client, although it was unfortunate that she had to go to court to get the faulty plans changed. However the judge recognised that the neighbours’ actions had led to the appeal, and ordered them to pay all of the client’s legal costs.